[Bug 511212] Review Request: cluster-glue - reusable clustering components

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511212





--- Comment #4 from Andrew Beekhof <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-23 03:06:36 EDT ---
Thanks for taking the time to look over the package. 

Regarding the review flag, is the follow from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process incorrect?

[Quote]
Wait for someone to review your package! At this point in the process, the
fedora-review flag is blank, meaning that no reviewer is assigned.
A reviewer takes on the task of reviewing your package. They will set the
fedora-review flag to ?
[/Quote]

1) I saw this under the SHOULD section and decided to consider it optional.
But I think you're right, I may as well add it and make rpmlint happy. 

3) Np.  I'll specify it manually, but as binaries from cluster-glue depend on
libs from libcluster-glue I had assumed that there would be an automatic
dependancy created.  Is that not the case?

Also, the warning mentioned is from libcluster-glue-devel.x86_64, so I don't
believe it will go away after this change.

2,4) I thought I remembered seeing that both lib%{name}  and %{name}-lib were
allowed, but I can't find anything one way or the other.  If anyone knows the
official policy here I'd be happy to comply.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]