Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511212 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Beekhof <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-23 03:06:36 EDT --- Thanks for taking the time to look over the package. Regarding the review flag, is the follow from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process incorrect? [Quote] Wait for someone to review your package! At this point in the process, the fedora-review flag is blank, meaning that no reviewer is assigned. A reviewer takes on the task of reviewing your package. They will set the fedora-review flag to ? [/Quote] 1) I saw this under the SHOULD section and decided to consider it optional. But I think you're right, I may as well add it and make rpmlint happy. 3) Np. I'll specify it manually, but as binaries from cluster-glue depend on libs from libcluster-glue I had assumed that there would be an automatic dependancy created. Is that not the case? Also, the warning mentioned is from libcluster-glue-devel.x86_64, so I don't believe it will go away after this change. 2,4) I thought I remembered seeing that both lib%{name} and %{name}-lib were allowed, but I can't find anything one way or the other. If anyone knows the official policy here I'd be happy to comply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review