Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #12 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-17 17:16:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Ok, care to look at the results in: > > > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/scratch/sandeen/task_1482920/ ? > > You don't need to include COPYING in -devel, since -devel requires > e2fsprogs-libs which contains it. Oops that was an oversight ... will fix. > Otherwise it seems that all my comments have been taken into account. > > rpmlint gives now > uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/sbin/uuidd uuidd > uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/sbin/uuidd uuidd > uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/libuuid uuidd > uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/libuuid uuidd > uuidd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libuuid 02775 > 12 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. > > Out of these the owner of the binary is a bit odd, shouldnt it be root:root? Hm, there was a reason for it, I need to remember :) I'll check in as it is now (w/ the COPYING fix) and look into that last bit, I need to refresh my memory. Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review