Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-07-17 17:09:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Ok, care to look at the results in: > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/scratch/sandeen/task_1482920/ ? You don't need to include COPYING in -devel, since -devel requires e2fsprogs-libs which contains it. Otherwise it seems that all my comments have been taken into account. rpmlint gives now uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/sbin/uuidd uuidd uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/sbin/uuidd uuidd uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/libuuid uuidd uuidd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/libuuid uuidd uuidd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libuuid 02775 12 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Out of these the owner of the binary is a bit odd, shouldnt it be root:root? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review