Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openstreetmap - A JavaScript library for displaying the OpenStreetMap.org map data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511144 Summary: Review Request: openstreetmap - A JavaScript library for displaying the OpenStreetMap.org map data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/openstreetmap/openstreetmap.spec SRPM URL: http://bochecha.fedorapeople.org/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-0-0.3.svn20090628.fc11.src.rpm Description: OpenStreetMap.org is the Wikipedia of mapping data. They provide a free to use and modify world map. This is the JavaScript API to use the OpenStreetMap.org map data in your web pages. ---- $ rpmlint SPECS/openstreetmap.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint openstreetmap-0-0.3.svn20090628.fc11.src.rpm openstreetmap.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary OpenStreetMap 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint openstreetmap-0-0.3.svn20090628.fc11.noarch.rpm openstreetmap.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary OpenStreetMap 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Not sure the warning is important or not, and I can't find a better summary for the package :-/ ---- Yes, that is only one JS file in a package. This might be overkill, but I need this API for an application I'm developping, and I wanted to provide an easy way to use it for my users. I have the following possibilities: 1. bundle it in my app 2. use the upstream hosted version at http://openstreetmap.org/openlayers/OpenStreetMap.js 3. package it as RPM for Fedora Possibility 1 is just plain ugly. Possibility 2 causes problems, as upstream might make a new release and break API compatibility. This leaves possibility 3, which has 2 added benefits: - the API can be shared by several web applications on a same system - updates can be made in relation with the openlayers API, as it is also packaged in Fedora (and the two generally move together) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review