Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #3 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-13 10:34:19 EDT --- Thanks for all your comments: [acme@doppio tuna]$ rpmlint /home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/SPECS/tuna.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [acme@doppio tuna]$ rpmlint /home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/SRPMS/tuna-0.9-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [acme@doppio tuna]$ rpmlint /home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/RPMS/noarch/tuna-0.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [acme@doppio tuna]$ rpmlint /home/acme/git/tuna/rpm/RPMS/noarch/oscilloscope-0.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm oscilloscope.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib oscilloscope.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Oscilloscope 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [acme@doppio tuna]$ I'm just waiting for an authorization for including a short article that describes the oscilloscope usage to then upload the new .src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review