Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-07-11 11:29:16 EDT --- Thanks for the speedy review! (In reply to comment #2) > qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 > /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 > qrupdate.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64 > /libqrupdate.so.1.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 > The library is linked against other libraries that it does not use. You have > to install the rpm and then do "rpmlint qrupdate" to see these. I don't think > these are problematic; it's not as if those libraries won't be linked in for > some other reason. Oh, didn't notice that. > I'm surprised there's nothing like a header, but I guess that's Fortan. You > just call the functions and hope you get the arguments the right way 'round. So was I. I think this is a 'feature' of Fortran 77; Fortran 90 has module files that do this. I really don't know *why* anyone would still want to write in a language that lacks e.g. dynamic memory allocation and has an 8 character length limit in function names and so on. qrupdate seems to have been written in 2008-2009!!! (Not to mention that modern Fortran compilers often have lacking F77 capabilities..) ** New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qrupdate Short Description: A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review