Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #19 from Mohammed Morsi <mmorsi@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-09 11:00:06 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback, I tried changing the spec to incorporate cflags / cxx flags as you suggested like so: %build export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" export CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$CFLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS" %{__gzip} anytermd.1 #execstack -c anytermd Unfortunately after building / running rpm lint on it both the unstripped-binary-or-object and executable stack (note I commented out execstack) issues persisted. Looking at the 1.1.29 makefile http://svn.anyterm.org/anyterm/tags/releases/1.1/1.1.29/common.mk the issue might be that the author explicitly sets CPP_FLAGS, overwriting it if previously set, and doesn't use CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS at all. Then again, trying the rpmbuild process w/ ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} explicitly set and passed to each invocation of g++ doesn't seem to resolve either of the issues (but does add "-02 -g" to the g++ command) Still not sure what I need do to resolve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review