Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-07-03 10:42:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > > > That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora. > > > > > > Why? > > Fedora's mission is to be a "leading edge distro", not a "bleeding edge" > > distro, consisting of more or less non-functional, immature packages. > > > > IMO, this package is not unlikely of the latter kind. > > That is your opinion, not mine or others I've spoken to, its not a topic for a > bug report. A package's maturity/quality is topic within a review. > But its a much used method within packages. Yes, these packages and your specs are of low quality. > Packaging guidelines discussions are for the mailing > list. Free free to continue shipping these apparently dysfunctional low quality packages. My advise to reviewers: Do not approve this package in this current shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review