[Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223





--- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-07-03 09:03:31 EDT ---
> > > That said, I am not sure, this package should enter Fedora.
> > 
> > Why?
> Fedora's mission is to be a "leading edge distro", not a "bleeding edge"
> distro, consisting of more or less non-functional, immature packages.
> 
> IMO, this package is not unlikely of the latter kind.

That is your opinion, not mine or others I've spoken to, its not a topic for a
bug report.

> > > Besides this, I am not excited about how you package your moblin packages. In
> > > particular, I consider you to be acting pretty careless wrt. the autotools,
> > > NVRs and further details.  
> > 
> > What's exactly wrong with them,
> You should not run the autotools at build-time, but run them in advance and add
> the result through patches - That's how the autotools are supposed to be used.
> 
> By not doing so, you are exposing yourselves to the risks of non-determinisic
> builts and your users to risks of exposing them to mis-built packages.

But its a much used method within packages. Same as above its not a discussion
to be had on a bug report but a discussion to be bought up as a proposed on
fedora-devel if you feel strongly about it.

> > I
> > believe the adhere to to the Package Guidelines but its always possible that
> > I've missed stuff.  
> The FPG doesn't contain a rule mandating it, because certain key-people in
> Fedora refuse to implement such a rule and prefer to expose people to risks
> because "it's so convenient".
> 
> My opinion differs substantially. I conside running the autotools during builts
> as elementary beginners mistake and refuse to review any package doing so.  

I'm not making you review my package and as you mentioned its your opinion. I
don't necessarily disagree but until upstream do proper 'make dist' packages
its going to remain the way it is. Its a perfectly valid package as the current
packaging requirements. Packaging guidelines discussions are for the mailing
list.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]