Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-06 11:12 EST ------- Just a quick check of 1.1.6-5. * Well, this package does not aimed for FC5 at all? This package can be rebuilt in mock under 20060906 rawhide, however this package cannot be rebuilt under FC5 (with 20060906 updates) with following error: No Package Found for evolution-data-server-devel >= 1.8 No Package Found for ORBit2-devel >= 2.14.1 0:evolution-2.6.3-1.fc5.5.i386 0:gnome-common-2.12.0-2.fc5.noarch 0:e2fsprogs-devel-1.38-12.i386 0:gettext-0.14.5-3.i386 0:libglade2-devel-2.5.1-4.fc5.1.i386 0:intltool-0.34.2-1.1.i386 0:gnome-keyring-devel-0.4.9-1.i386 Cannot find build req evolution-data-server-devel >= 1.8. Exiting. ending even if I remove version-release related requirement issue, still I cannot rebuild this under FC5 with following error: Requested 'ORBit-2.0 >= 2.14.1' but version of ORBit-2.0 is 2.14.0 Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GNOME_FULL_CFLAGS and GNOME_FULL_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57376 (%build) * rpmlint for FC6-devel-built rpms complaints: W: evolution-brutus macro-in-%changelog makeinstall * Why does this package use Autoreq: no ? This description forbids finding libraries requirements, which I think is quite unwilling. Even if you want to specify version-related requirements, "Autoreq: no" is unnecessary because you can simply add the requirements in addition to auto-finding requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review