Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx |radford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-24 16:43:02 EDT --- 1. For multiarch packages you'll find out it's better not to change the timestamp of txt files during encoding conversion (that's why the other spec had a touch). But for a noarch package, in %doc, I guess no one cares a lot 2. Please do include OFL-FAQ.txt as %doc too, even though OFL.txt is the main legal document the FAQ has some legal value. And it's not big I won't force another back-and-forth for 2. but do fix it before cvs import ☀☀☀ APPROVED ☀☀☀ The review is finished and you're now on you own to build, push and register your package everywhere it matters. Your next steps are documented on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review