[Bug 506168] Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506168


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-06-24 03:00:02 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1415422
- rpmlint message for SRPM and for RPM.
rubygem-allison.src: W: strange-permission
rubygem-allison-2.0.3-allison-path-symlink.patch 0600
==> Fix this
+ source files match upstream url
da73e1dc3856ec3c0fef09a8f5f390743303ed69  allison-2.0.3.gem
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application

Suggestions:
This is first time I am reviewing ruby package.
1)Ruby packaging guidelines suggest
gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0}
whereas in SPEC its
gem install --local --install-dir $(pwd)%{gemdir} --force --rdoc -V %{SOURCE0}
==> Though its same if you like can you use %{buildroot} instead $(pwd)

2) Not sure but see Documentation files getting installed at
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/allison-2.0.3. Can they go to %doc?
Got confused how following got evaluated for main rpm package
%doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]*

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]