Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From colding@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-06 03:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > > Also, libglade2-devel evolution e2fsprogs-devel is missing for BuildRequires > > > (checked by mock) > > > > Hmm... strange. Evolution should not be required by evolution-brutus, only e-d-s > > and related packages. > As in the comment #8, configure complains: > > /configure: line 2122: evolution: command not found > > configure includes the line: > EVOLUTION_VERSION=`evolution --version | cut -b 17,18,19 2>/dev/null` > and this requires evolution. > > Note: configure also includes: > > cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF > #define EVO_PATHNAME "/usr/bin/evolution-$EVOLUTION_VERSION" > _ACEOF > > however, with evolution-2.7.92-7.fc6, EVOLUTION_VERSION is 2.7 while > there exists /usr/bin/evolution-2.8 (not /usr/bin/evolution-2.7), so anyway > this is wrong. OK, yes I see. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review