Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-06-08 07:41:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Please check if Rakefile or install.rb are needed for binary rpm. See below. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > $ gem contents term-ansicolor > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > expects that examples/ directory should be under %geminstdir. > While we allow (don't forbid) to delete some files listed in > "$ gem contents <gemname>") if packagers think they are not needed, > I don't think moving examples/ directory under %gemdir/doc is > needed. I adjusted all the packages to contain all the files "gem contents" list (reverted the deletes). I feel that it should always be consistent with the actual contents and don't think it's worth patching the lists for any of the files I used to remove. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-term-ansicolor.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-term-ansicolor-1.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review