Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-06-08 11:57:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, > - Now build.log complains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 68 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/CHANGES > 69 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/GPL > 70 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/README.en > 71 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/VERSION > -------------------------------------------------------------- I am aware of this and believe that it is ok. Makes no real harm and saves me from enumerating the contents of the directory just to avoid duplicate listings. > And as you did so before %geminstdir/examples should be marked as > %doc. Will fix (for other packages as well). > So %files should be: > -------------------------------------------------------------- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %dir %{geminstdir} > %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* > %doc %{geminstdir}/examples/ > %{geminstdir}/*.rb > %{geminstdir}/lib/ > > %doc %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/ > %{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem > %{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec > --------------------------------------------------------------- > thoughts? I can do this (and for other packages as well) if you insist on eliminate of "listed twice" warning but I'll prefer not to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review