Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #37 from Paul Lange <palango@xxxxxx> 2009-06-06 21:38:15 EDT --- Hey Mauricio, the upstream tarball build well in mock. What have you tried and whats your system? (btw, the diff between your tarball and the official one shows no changes at mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in) s the version of To version numbers: Every version of your package needs an unique identifier. We use a [project-version]-[package-release] form, where [project-version] is the version of the upstream project and [package-release] the version of the package (which starts from 1 for each new upstream version btw) The release number at the beginning of the spec-file should be the same as the latest changelog entry. Because of this I said we should take three, because there currently are 3 entries. We could replace them by one, then we would set release number to 1 again. I would support that, maybe with a text like this: * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.0-1 - Initial packaging with help by Ryan Bair Hope this makes things clearer for you!? Furthermore could we have a better package description? Thanks for your work! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review