Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #36 from Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-05 14:57:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > The source tarball has to be exactly the same as the upstream release. You can > check that with md5sum: > [paul@papaya SOURCES]$ md5sum monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > 55f225ffb47a67289d342bf389e133c8 monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > [paul@papaya SOURCES]$ md5sum > ../../Downloads/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > b60e9a0783f294aaa137c78e32c4f6be > ../../Downloads/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > > Please use the upstream tarball. using the upstream packages I get: .0.0.0 mono(mscorlib) = 2.0.0.0 Processing files: monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel-2.0-3.fc10 rpmbuild: rpmfc.c:407: rpmfcHelper: Assertion `EVR != ((void *)0)' failed. Aborted That is a bug in rpmbuild tools that crash with certain missing info in the sources, now I don't remeber what exactly wha tit was, but if I remember correctly was the missing Version info at: mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in > > I know it's nutpicking - but lets make it right: What I meant with change the > changelog is this diff: > 67c67 > < * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.0-1 > --- > > * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.0-3 > 70c70 > < * Sun May 03 2009 Ryan Bair <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.0-1 > --- > > * Sun May 03 2009 Ryan Bair <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.0-2 > 73c73 > < * Thu Apr 30 2009 Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.0 > --- > > * Thu Apr 30 2009 Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.0-1 > > > The last entry should always be equal to the version and release number. Hope > that makes sense to you. nop, sorry not at all :-S Something like this for the last one then?: * Thu Jun 05 2009 Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> - 2.0-3 - Source tarball changed to the upstream one ..also why we are using "3" as the release number? > > OK, only the tarball left for the review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review