Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-03 14:16:51 EDT --- Version: 20090602 Will this always be versioned by the date? Perhaps "0.20090602" might be better to allow for real version numbers in the future without Epoch? BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) This isn't even used by modern rpmbuild. Doesn't need to be so complicated. ExclusiveArch: noarch Please use "BuildArch: noarch" instead, except the next problem... [warren@newcaprica noarch]$ rpmlint mobile-broadband-provider-info-20090602-1.fc11.noarch.rpm mobile-broadband-provider-info.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/mobile-broadband-provider-info.pc This is a serious problem. Note the lib64 dir. Perhaps you can't make this noarch if you want to use pkgconfig? [warren@newcaprica SRPMS]$ rpmlint mobile-broadband-provider-info-20090602-1.fc11.src.rpm mobile-broadband-provider-info.src:25: W: make-check-outside-check-section make check mobile-broadband-provider-info.src:38: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(0644,root,root) %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review