Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-01 11:05:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The request in which you were asked to generate the missing file is somewhat > dated - in fact it was common practice amongst the perl SIG at that time to add > the files. However, since then the packaging guidelines have changed and now > quite clearly state that license text should be included if and only if > upstream includes them: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines > > MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc I agree here. This is one point that I see capnspec does not needed to create manually COPYING and Artistic files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review