Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-01 08:59:12 EDT --- The request in which you were asked to generate the missing file is somewhat dated - in fact it was common practice amongst the perl SIG at that time to add the files. However, since then the packaging guidelines have changed and now quite clearly state that license text should be included if and only if upstream includes them: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review