[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224





--- Comment #22 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-05-17 07:29:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)

> But after discussion about the requirement for a -devel package with the
> rabbitmq development team, we are reluctant to split the package in this way. 
> While the rabbitmq server can run without the .hrl files, they have uses that
> are not restricted to development activities:  They are useful to allow
> interaction with the server at the erlang command line, for administration and
> monitoring.  So we don't believe that they fall into the same category as the
> header files of a library, as described in the "Devel packages" section of the
> packaging guidelines.

The problem is that we (I mean people, who interested in getting more erlang
software into Fedora/EPEL) still haven't a rules/policy for packaging erlang
applications and libraries. Among (still very few) erlang-related packages in
Fedora/EPEL, some packaged splitted into main and *-devel subpackage, while
others - not (erlang itself).

After some thinking about this issue, I finally agreed with you - we should
bundle hrl-files with main package, and this mine request should be ignored.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]