Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #22 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-17 07:29:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > But after discussion about the requirement for a -devel package with the > rabbitmq development team, we are reluctant to split the package in this way. > While the rabbitmq server can run without the .hrl files, they have uses that > are not restricted to development activities: They are useful to allow > interaction with the server at the erlang command line, for administration and > monitoring. So we don't believe that they fall into the same category as the > header files of a library, as described in the "Devel packages" section of the > packaging guidelines. The problem is that we (I mean people, who interested in getting more erlang software into Fedora/EPEL) still haven't a rules/policy for packaging erlang applications and libraries. Among (still very few) erlang-related packages in Fedora/EPEL, some packaged splitted into main and *-devel subpackage, while others - not (erlang itself). After some thinking about this issue, I finally agreed with you - we should bundle hrl-files with main package, and this mine request should be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review