Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 David Wragg <dpw@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpw@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #21 from David Wragg <dpw@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-13 11:52:20 EDT --- Hubert is busy with his studies at the moment, so I'm taking care of the remaining issues raised by Peter. I'm almost done addressing the blockers raised, and the EPEL build failure. But after discussion about the requirement for a -devel package with the rabbitmq development team, we are reluctant to split the package in this way. While the rabbitmq server can run without the .hrl files, they have uses that are not restricted to development activities: They are useful to allow interaction with the server at the erlang command line, for administration and monitoring. So we don't believe that they fall into the same category as the header files of a library, as described in the "Devel packages" section of the packaging guidelines. Peter, do you feel that this context be taken into account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review