Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #13 from David Sugar <dyfet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-10 10:55:46 EDT --- I actually wrote a patch (for upstream) to make openssl optional in exosip2 at configure awhile back. Yes, openssl licensing is...rather problematic. And nss has fips certification. I am doing another upstream patch for exosip2 upstream related to terminating with reason, and maybe I will try to also substitute nss in it as well then. I also often hear "openssl" falls under the "system library exception", a rather uncertain assertion though perhaps a bit easier to say on BSD. I re-wrote the init script in a generic way for the next upstream release, and have used that as a patch for this one, hence the patch file is updated and should solve these other issues. I now understand how condrestart relates to updates, and it makes a lot of sense to me. In debian, I did it an uglier way though achieving the same effect. I also replaced $(INSTALL) sipwitch.py with $(INSTALL_DATA) in the patch and that cleared the exec permission problem, since sipwitch.py generated by swig has no #! and should not be marked execute. I use 0660/0770 because I often create an "admin" group for the daemon, and users of that group have to be able to modify config, write the control fifo, etc. Perhaps that process should occur automatically in pre/post scripts and be "standardized"? Anyway here is what I have now: Updated Spec: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.spec Updated SRPM: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Updated Patch: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review