Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #10 from Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-08 16:37:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing > > > --disable-static to configure? > > > > not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage. > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > > /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la > > 1.) .la is not a static library > 2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no > reason at all What I meant was that between having both a --disable-static and a rm line and having just a rm line I'd prefer the latter. Seems like less clutter to me. Of course a few cycles and disk accesses making the static lib could be spared but imho its hardly worth it. Anyway, if this ever gets to the repo I'll put in the --disable-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review