Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-05-08 16:14:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just a > > shared object. > > Empirical evdence doesn't agree, (test rpm without ldconfig): Sorry, I did not notice it uses ld.so.conf.d. > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la} > > Why do you call a recursive rm here? > > Just a habit. Doubt it will hurt anything, but the -r can be removed. > > > Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing > > --disable-static to configure? > > not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage. > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la 1.) .la is not a static library 2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no reason at all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review