Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-28 00:19:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1322307 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e242915f57878465ef0b947eaf2e0b5c Capture-Tiny-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=316, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.12 usr 0.01 sys + 1.65 cusr 0.47 csys = 2.25 CPU) + Package perl-Capture-Tiny-0.05-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Capture::Tiny) = 0.05 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(IO::Handle) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Again you included BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.006 Remove that. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review