Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-06 18:20:46 EDT --- rpmlint: mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libp11.h mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/libp11.pc mingw32-libp11.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.la mingw32-libp11.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libp11.dll.a mingw32-libp11.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. (this is f10 rpmlint, f11 rpmlint would not have complained) These can be ignored as per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review