Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 --- Comment #4 from Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-06 18:00:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I understand why you need to generate the checksums after rpm is done poling at > the binaries; I was just confused by the language in use: > > This overrides the default which was in place at least from Red Hat Linux 9 > through Fedora 11's development cycle. > > which (to me, at least) sort of sounds like it's overriding some sort of > default checksum generation. Not that's it's in any way material, but perhaps > it will explain my confusion. Oh, I see what you mean. It's overriding the macro to wire in the generation of the HMAC values after the default buildroot policies are run. I don't have better text ready, but I'd appreciate any suggestions. > Anyway, I guess it's not reasonable to run the test suite unless you somehow > compile a specal version that doesn't check its checksums. I guess it would be > nice if the executables had some way to skip the verification, but absent that > the test suite isn't useful. Yeah, still trying to come up with a good fix for that. > Finally, the issue of where to put the checksums. Given the problems with the > alternatives, %{_libdir} seems fine, rpmlint's complaint about it > nonwithstanding. > > I guess that covers everything. APPROVED Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review