Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-23 17:58:38 EDT --- Ok, this one looks good. Can't test it fully because of bug #491764 but it passes my other tests ♼♼♼ APPROVED ♼♼♼ Please make sure the other steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Source_package_naming_changes are taken care of. Also I think you deserve at least co-maintainership of the new package. Congratulations This is about the worst-case font packaging scenario you can get in Fedora so if you don't forget what you've learnt here you should be able to package about any font now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review