Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-23 17:41:31 EDT --- More stuff to check: * The License: field must be filled with the appropriate license Short License identifier(s) from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses * They already provide a package suitable for Source0: http://anyterm.org/download/anyterm-1.1.29.tbz2 so I don't see the need to pull it from SVN * the stuff you added can go in Source1: Source2: etc * you can remove the gcc-c++ BR https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * chances are the boost requirement will be picked up automatically, we can check this out with a mock build * build with make %{?_smp_mflags}, if for some reason you can't use parallel build, please add a comment See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * remember to bump the release number at each iteration (and update changelog where appropriate) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review