Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lesstif - OSF/Motif(R) library clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203274 rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus@xxxxxxx) ------- Additional Comments From rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-21 07:54 EST ------- Quick-n-dirty items I see: 1. MUST drop Obsoletes/Provides: openmotif, openmotif-devel at least for now(*). No Conflicts either. See also 6. (*) Maybe we could consider using versioned Ob/Pr, say something like Obsoletes: openmotif < 2.2, openmotif21, Provides: openmotif = 2.1, but there would have to be a strong demonstratable need for this (and I currently don't see any). 2. MUST: +BuildRequires: fontconfig-devel, since ./configure says: checking for fontconfig-config... no checking fontconfig/fontconfig.h usability... yes checking fontconfig/fontconfig.h presence... yes checking for fontconfig/fontconfig.h... yes checking for FcInit... yes 3. MUST: +BuildRequires: mesa-libGLw-devel 4. MUST: use versioned Obsoletes/Provides: lesstif-clients, ie, Obsoletes: lesstif-clients < %{version}-%{release} Provides: lesstif-clients = %{version}-%{release} 5. SHOULD: drop Oboletes/Provides: lesstif-1.2-devel, lesstif-2.0-devel I see no purpose for this (anymore), especially Provides. 6. SHOULD: Come up with a better co-installable solution, maybe split out lesstif-clients again (like upstream) so the main pkg doesn't conflict. Conflicts in -clients and/or -devel is ok, imo. But for now, maybe don't worry about this too much... we're going on the assumption (for now) that openmotif's non-OSI license will eject it from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review