Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt - Represent and manage a libvirt hypervisor connection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203039 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-18 00:13 EST ------- The full test suite requires perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::Pod) to run; these should be buildrequires'ed. Add these two and I'll approve. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + source files match upstream: 63b776d65213df313685fc93b808b3bf Sys-Virt-0.1.1.tar.gz 63b776d65213df313685fc93b808b3bf Sys-Virt-0.1.1.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. + package builds in mock (5/x86_64). + rpmlint is silent. + final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-Sys-Virt-0.1.1-2.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Virt.so()(64bit) perl(Sys::Virt) = 0.1.1 perl(Sys::Virt::Domain) perl(Sys::Virt::Error) perl-Sys-Virt = 0.1.1-2.fc5 == requires libvirt.so.0()(64bit) libxenstore.so()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Sys::Virt::Domain) perl(Sys::Virt::Error) perl(XSLoader) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) ** perl-Sys-Virt-debuginfo-0.1.1-2.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Virt.so.debug()(64bit) perl-Sys-Virt-debuginfo = 0.1.1-2.fc5 == requires + no shared libraries in the system paths are present. + package is not relocatable. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. X %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=7, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.28 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.34 CPU) + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review