Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 --- Comment #8 from Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-07 22:36:37 EDT --- Oh, I somehow missed the hint in the bug title that this is only supposed to provide libpq and not the whole postgres package. That's a perfectly respectable goal, but I suggest that the package is misnamed in that case. What would happen if someone later wants to package all of postgres for mingw? I think that you should call it mingw32-postgresql-libs and try to make the package contents match the -libs subpackage of the regular postgresql SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review