Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #3 from David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-02 22:13:46 EDT --- Thanks. I've fixed it, including the ppc64 issue. It now packages for all architectures on both dist-f10 and dist-f11 (using koji build --scratch). The Rawhide problem was primarily because the new gcc 4.4 is much stricter about C++ headers. Basically, you HAVE to #include <cstdio> if you use stuff that's defined there (like EOF). In previous gcc's, many other #includes also quietly brought in these definitions. gcc's new behavior is correct, but I think we'll see LOTS of C++ patches for this Fedora release (!). There's also a change in the flex++ API that I had to resolve. This was unfun to work around, but I think I've got it. I also added throw() definitions for 2 mallocs as an optimization/cleanup, courtesy of some Ubuntu feedback. In the process, I think also managed to solve the ppc64 debuginfo problem. It turns out that if you invoke gcc with "-gstabs+", the debuginfo process will fail. This happens on x86_64 on rawhide, too. It's a known Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453506 Here's the koji scratch build for dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1215612 Koji scratch build for dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1215692 They're rpmlint-clean; I did rpmlint on the .spec, the SRPM, and divine-mc-1.3-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm. Here's the updated spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/divine-mc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/divine-mc-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review