Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #6 from Pascal <pascal22p@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-21 13:22:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > * You can use the macro %{name} instead of Fox in a number of places in the The name of the package is not the name of the archive. I used the same name as debian used for their deb: http://packages.debian.org/fr/sid/objcryst-fox > > * Please add an extra \n between two change in the changelog (some tool used Done in the spec but new srpm/rpm not updated > > It might be nice also to give to the reviewer an input file and an output file > so that the software could actually be tested :) There are example files in /usr/share/doc/objcryst-fox... A tutorial is here: http://vincefn.net/Fox/Tutorials > > You might also be interested to join the SciTech SIG: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:SciTech_SIG > Yes, good idea, I'll see when this get pushed in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review