Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-08-16 00:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The version from comment #3 fails in mock here with (from build.log): > + echo 'Patch #0 (sdlperl_2.1.2-1.diff.gz):' > Patch #0 (sdlperl_2.1.2-1.diff.gz): > + /bin/gzip -d > + patch -p1 -s > + STATUS=0 > + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' > + patch -p1 -b -z .deb > patching file src/OpenGL.xs > + patch -p1 > patching file src/OpenGL.xs > Hunk #1 succeeded at 912 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1006 (offset 2 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 1090 (offset 2 lines). > + echo 'Patch #1 (perl-SDL-no-mixertest.patch):' > Patch #1 (perl-SDL-no-mixertest.patch): > + patch -p1 -b --suffix .no-mixertest -s > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- t/mixerpm.t~ 2003-03-21 19:48:58.000000000 +0200 > |+++ t/mixerpm.t 2004-07-11 00:12:59.851670873 +0300 > -------------------------- > File to patch: > Skip this patch? [y] > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2893 (%prep) > > Agreed with comment #4. Erm, a patch failing to apply is not mock specific, it seems that for some reason you are still using the patch from the 1.20.3 package which was updated for / in the 2.1.3 package. I just tried to install the provided SRPM on a different PC then where it was developed and there it builds fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review