Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-20 05:12:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > An email to Steven Pritchard is written. I get no answer until now. Should I > additional put the email-text as a comment to the id=246348? Let's wait for a while - maybe he is at the vacations, maybe he got a lot of work to do. In any case, feel free to add a comments to a previus review request. > I would be nice if the packages would be tested. I am not sure if the > parrot-0.9.1 packages are installable without problems on other computers. I > think the package for Fedora 10 will make trouble. In order to check successful builds of packages, we may use koji (for example, to check whether yourapp.srpm can be built on F-10): koji build --scratch dist-f10 /path/to/yourapp.src.rpm > It is a subpackage parrot-docs integrated. I think this subpackage do not need > an architectur. But I am not successful to make it as a noarch subpackage. Noarch subpackages is the upcoming feature of rpm, so let's wait while necessary functionality will be fully implement and tested. BTW if nobody volunteers, I'll review your package (after we establish communications with Steven to resolve the issue above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review