Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Gerd Pokorra <gp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.parrot.org --- Comment #2 from Gerd Pokorra <gp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-20 04:53:35 EDT --- An email to Steven Pritchard is written. I get no answer until now. Should I additional put the email-text as a comment to the id=246348? I produced parrot-0.9.1 rpms (32bit) for Fedora 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11alpha. On a 64bit computer I produced parrot-0.9.1 rpms for Fedora 9. The packages are all stored under the URL ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/<fedora-release-number>/... I would be nice if the packages would be tested. I am not sure if the parrot-0.9.1 packages are installable without problems on other computers. I think the package for Fedora 10 will make trouble. It is a subpackage parrot-docs integrated. I think this subpackage do not need an architectur. But I am not successful to make it as a noarch subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review