Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-17 11:44:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > If your final opinion is to leave all programs in mrpt-apps, I would see that > fine. In that case, I might also join "mrpt-example-datasets" back into > "mrpt-apps" as it was in the beginning. I think this idea (i.e. putting all programs in mrpt-apps) is much better. Some comments - For tarball based on svn repository, I prefer to include revision number rather than the date you checked the source because revision number identifies the codes used in the srpm, however this is left to your choice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review