[Bug 202318] Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Scalar-Properties - Run-time properties on scalar variables


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202318


cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-14 22:16 EST -------
Everything looks good.

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
+ source files match upstream:
 19aefcff9043f8645d42f0bbe8c39d18  Scalar-Properties-0.12.tar.gz
 19aefcff9043f8645d42f0bbe8c39d18  Scalar-Properties-0.12.tar.gz.srpm
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ package builds in mock (5/x86_64).
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
 == provides
 perl(Scalar::Properties) = 0.12
 perl-Scalar-Properties = 0.12-1.fc5
 == requires
 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
 perl(strict)
 perl(warnings)
+ no shared libraries are present.
+ package is not relocatable.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ %check is present and all tests pass:
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.
+ not a web app.

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]