Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efont-unicode-bdf: Unicode font by Electronic Font Open Laboratory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202032 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-14 22:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) >From your option, I came to think that this package (efont-unicode-bdf) should own its ORIGINAL font directory. This package doesn't require fonts-japanese, of course. However, putting the fonts in /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc will cause problem, especially when fonts-japanese is removed when this package is installed because fonts-japanese calls "chkfontpath -q -r /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc", which removes the entry of efont-unicode-bdf, too. We must treat which package of this package and fonts-japanese will be removed first, which is somewhat troublesome. So, I moved the font directory from /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc to /usr/share/fonts/japanese/%{name} and added some necessary ghost files. The updated spec file is http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf.spec (0.4.2-4) Note: the previous spec file is preserved as http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/efont-unicode-bdf-0.4.2-3.spec Note: this change affects bug 201170 (jfbterm), so please check if this change is proper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review