Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-29 13:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint also showed this non-standard-group error to me. I just looked at some > other packages which used thos group tag. I was unsure whether non standard > names are allowed or not. - Unless you have some reason you want to use the previous Group tag, I suggest to follow the suggestion from rpmint. > Download url is fixed. - Note that wiki suggest http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tgz (middle "sourceforge" is not written) > So when requiring explicitly icedtea I just use java(-devel) >= 1:1.6.0? (please make it sure that you use epoch here) - I guess you wanted to say "openjdk" because on F-9/10/11 icedtea no longer exists. However, yes, with "(Build)Requires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0" java-1.6.0-openjdk(-devel) is always selecteed, because "java-1.5.0-gcj(-devel)" does not satisfy this (Build)Requires. Now looks good (however I suggest to modify the SourceURL a bit) ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (xmlenc) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review