Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 --- Comment #3 from Bernard Johnson <bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-29 13:53:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Perl package source generally includes license test in its perl module source > text files(.pm here say) only. The author thinks that the information in the README is sufficient. > Suggestions: > 1) SRPM when extracted got SPEC with License as "Unknown" whereas SPEC file > link shows correct license as "GPL+ or Artistic" Someone I think I uploaded a file in progress - this has been fixed. > 2) Summary should be > "Perl extension for the SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Project" fixed > 3) %files should be > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc Changes README examples > %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* > %{perl_vendorarch}/Sane* > %{_mandir}/man3/* fixed Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-Sane.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-Sane-0.02-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review