[Bug 199919] Review Request: Asuka

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Asuka


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx  2006-08-11 01:22 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> One problem remains to be discussed:
> E: asuka incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ircd
> W: asuka incoherent-init-script-name ircd
> 
> As we see these both point to the same: name incoherency. As you can see the
> binary is called ircd. So it is expected to be _the_ ircd on a system. The
> reason for these names of the files is that the package contains the undernet
> irc daemon with a specific Asuka patchset from Quakenet (which assumes
> exclusiveness on the machine).
> 
> I saw that there is an ircd-hybrid in extras. It contains the very same files
> (everything just named ircd). So  we have two options:
> * it may be an option to rename the package to ircd-asuka and rename the other
> files (and the user) appropriately. This should make it easy to distuinguish the
> packages and install them side-by-side.
> * Another way is to make the packages conflict. This makes sense since in
> general you do not want two ircds on your system that you can confuse...
> 
> So this decision has to be made now. I'd vote for the latter way since this is
> closer to what a asuka-user is known.

I agree that this should be decided upon before this package gets included into
FE. But I'm not sure if I'm the one who should make this descission. I think it
would be best to discuss this on the fedora-extras-list.

I personally would prefer renaming the binary and init script instead of using a
Conflicts, a user should be able to install both if he wants to toy around. If
he then tries to start them both at the same port the latest one will fail,
which is kinda what he is asking for when doing things like that.

Also I believe that there is an unwritten policy that Conflicts should never be
used within FE.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]