Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Asuka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199919 ------- Additional Comments From tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-07 20:25 EST ------- A new package is available at http://www.niemueller.de/projects/extrpms/packages/fedora-extras-5/asuka-1.2.1-2.src.rpm (spec file at known place). I have incorporated most of the suggested changes. One problem remains to be discussed: E: asuka incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ircd W: asuka incoherent-init-script-name ircd As we see these both point to the same: name incoherency. As you can see the binary is called ircd. So it is expected to be _the_ ircd on a system. The reason for these names of the files is that the package contains the undernet irc daemon with a specific Asuka patchset from Quakenet (which assumes exclusiveness on the machine). I saw that there is an ircd-hybrid in extras. It contains the very same files (everything just named ircd). So we have two options: * it may be an option to rename the package to ircd-asuka and rename the other files (and the user) appropriately. This should make it easy to distuinguish the packages and install them side-by-side. * Another way is to make the packages conflict. This makes sense since in general you do not want two ircds on your system that you can confuse... So this decision has to be made now. I'd vote for the latter way since this is closer to what a asuka-user is known. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review