Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481472 Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paskalis@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|notting@xxxxxxxxxx |nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Paskalis <paskalis@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-26 09:33:50 EDT --- Upgrade path works through Obsoletes: Provides: not provided (edrip-fonts is not required by any package in the repo, so it is ok) The license patch in the spec file is a bit mysterious, so I had to dig CVS history to see why it was there in the first place. Could you please restore the spec file comments explaining the need for this patch? Or alternatively (if you don't want to litter the spec file with comments) put it in another FILE mentioned in the spec? No other comments, so: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review