Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #31 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-26 09:05:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > So according to the newest blender.spec in devel (at least), we now have a > blender arch dependent plugins directory. > Once that said i'm not sure how it can be useful; specially if yafaray needs to > writte it's own configuration and content data. > You can look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 > for some discution with the blender maintainer. > > On your side, did you have improved the yafaray package. > Is it possible to have some clean patches adopted upstream so you don't needs > the tweaks in %prep ? No. Surprisinly enough, it still builds with today's snapshot. Unless you have another suggestion, I think everything is in its appropriate place. The problem is that I cannot test it in F10. I have an Intel card and, besides the performance being really poor, blender segfaults all the time. Using F8, however, I had no problem whatsoever. Can you test yafaray in F10? Regarding the patches, they can be done, but they would have to be Fedora independent, and I do not know how to select the architecture without using macros, such as %{_lib}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review