Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #48 from Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-22 16:08:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > Using static libraries instead of shared libraries isn't a matter of > preference. > Upstream should be educated to use shared library. Unless there is a very > imperial technical reason (circle dependency, ABI un-stability, etc). > > This package shouldn't make use of a static library instead of creating a > shared object. The last update from upstream was in early 2008 and the email address bounces. > Futhermore src-mathlink and src-mathlink2 aren't compiled Are these useful? > Again, there is no reason for such package to install theses headers in > /usr/include instead of /usr/include/cddlib to prevent namespace issues. Agreed. > Also, Adding pkgconfig support should have been done to ease the > -I/usr/include/cddlib addition. Unneeded work considering how many dependencies this library will have. > cddlibman.pdf should have been generated from the .tex file. Done. > How do you run the example ? $ gcc /usr/share/doc/cddlib-devel-094f/src/testcdd1.c -I/usr/include/cddlib -lcdd $ ./a.out When it asks you for a file, pass one of the files in /usr/share/doc/cddlib-devel-094f/examples/*.ine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review