Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-22 15:57:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I chose the "v" version of the crda tarball because those had later dates than > the equivalent non-"v" versions. I made the assumption that this was the new > release policy for the project. Just using whichever they're using would work - I find it odd that they have both tarballs. > I'm happy to change the spec summary -- how about "Regulatory compliance daemon > for 802.11 wireless networking"? Sounds good. > I will move and rename the udev rules. Any suggestions for choosing a numeric > priority? It probably doesn't make a big difference. If nothing else is acting on regulatory events, pick an earlier number and you may want to add OPTIONS+="last_rule"; this (theoretically) would speed up processing some. > The point about /usr being mounted later is a good one. I don't know how > realistic a NFS-mounted /usr over wireless is, but it probably makes sense to > allow for wireless networking and all allowed channels even when /usr isn't > mounted. Are there any other guidelines differentiating /lib versus /usr/lib? With NetworkManager on /usr, we don't really support nfs-over-wireless - my main concern is whether these events are going to be generated on driver load or similar activities on startup, and will then get 'missed' if /usr isn't there yet. If that's not the case, it's probably fine. > Realistically I don't know how much difference it makes -- I don't > think either crda or wireless-regdb are likely to be spun very often, and crda > is not such a big package as to discourage revving it when wireless-regdb > changes -- thoughts? If updates aren't going to be that often, it's not a big deal. I was just worried about if there is going to be a 'monthly' spin of the regdb or something similar that the updates might start to add up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review