Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Lucian Langa <cooly@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |cooly@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Lucian Langa <cooly@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-18 11:17:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I forgot to add, rpmlint still complains about the soname, and about the > unstripped binaries/executables. I'm not fully sure what is wrong now. You need to setup soname to libslim.so.<major>. I'm sorry for misleading you. For now you can setup soname to libslim.so.2, but probably the best way to handle this is to contact upstream. btw any news on that ? Also you need to make sure test target correctly picks libslim.so.2, so you need to symlink libslim.so to libslim.so.2 in builddir, or tests would fail: ../bin/slim --preserve -k -C -m2 -i -c1 -r16384 /tmp/data_partial.bin ../bin/slim: error while loading shared libraries: libslim.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Another suggestion is using INSTALL="install -p" to make install from %files section to preserve timestamps of installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review